Reviewer Guidelines

radioquery.com founded as an independent journal network in order to make groundbreaking scientific research works available to the world irrespective of origin, and especially for new and or young scientists who, usually, find it difficult to publish in more traditional journals. At radioquery.com, we strive to ensure that all of the content we publish meets the highest academic standards. The peer review process is designed to assess the originality, validity, and overall quality of every manuscript submitted before it is finally accepted for publication. Reviewers help maintain the integrity of the publishing process by ensuring that plagiarized, poor quality, or other unsuitable work is not approved for publication.

The Reviewer

Peer review is crucial to safeguarding the quality and integrity of scientific and scholarly research. radioquery.com fully supports the peer review process and recognizes reviewers' contributions to the success of the journal. Reviewers are chosen based on their experience in their field, this is a voluntory position.. Reviewers are responsible for providing constructive comments and critique on submitted manuscripts before they are accepted for final publication.